Resources search

Living with Ménière’s disease: an interpretative phenomenological analysis

KAUR TALEWAR, Kulvinder
CASSIDY, Elizabeth
MCINTYRE, Anne
January 2019

Expand view

Purpose: To explore the meanings of Ménière’s disease from the perspective of people living with this condition and to understand what was considered significant and important in participants’ everyday lives.

 

Materials and methods: Four women with Ménière’s disease participated in face-to-face semi-structured interviews. Accounts were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using an iterative process integral to Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.

 

Results: Three interconnected themes were identified. “You have no control whatsoever” conveys participants’ perceptions of vertigo as having a disruptive and ongoing impact on physical and psychosocial function in everyday life. “Ménière’s takes away your life completely” describes Ménière’s as impinging on participants’ most meaningful activities and relationships, and as restricting their ability to live their lives on their own terms. “You get on with life” recounts participants’ efforts to refashion their lives whilst living with this condition and manage its most harmful effects. The psychosocial impact of living with Ménière’s disease and its relevance to rehabilitation is discussed.

 

Conclusions: Ménière’s disease has an enduring physical and psychosocial impact. Clinicians who acknowledge and respond to an individual’s subjective experience of their condition may be key to their engagement in therapy. Service users should have a voice in health service design and delivery.

Employers’ views on disability, employability, and labor market inclusion: a phenomenographic study

STRINDLUND, Lina
ABRANDT-DAHLGREN, Madeleine
STAHL, Christian
June 2018

Expand view

Purpose: This study aims to increase our understanding of employers’ views on the employability of people with disabilities. Despite employers’ significant role in labor market inclusion for people with disabilities, research is scarce on how employers view employability for this group.

 

Methods: This was a qualitative empirical study with a phenomenographic approach using semi-structured interviews with 27 Swedish employers from a variety of settings and with varied experience of working with people with disabilities.

 

Results: The characteristics of employers’ views on the employability of people with disabilities can be described as multifaceted. Different understandings of the interplay between underlying individual-, workplace-, and authority-related aspects form three qualitatively different views of employability, namely as constrained by disability, independent of disability, and conditional. These views are also characterized on a meta-level through their association with the cross-cutting themes: trust, contribution, and support.

 

Conclusions: The study presents a framework for understanding employers’ different views of employability for people with disabilities as a complex internal relationship between conceived individual-, workplace-, and authority-related aspects. Knowledge of the variation in conceptions of employability for people with disability may facilitate for rehabilitation professionals to tailor their support for building trustful partnerships with employers, which may enhance the inclusion of people with disabilities on the labor market.

E-bulletin